Grubb & Ellis Listing Agreements in Bankruptcy–Part 3

Next we will examine the situation where the broker/debtor has already entered into a listing agreement and a non-binding letter of intent between the seller and buyer exists prior to the filing of the broker’s bankruptcy petition.  Subsequent to the filing of the petition, the property is sold to the buyer who executed the letter of intent – what now?     

As you will remember from the prior post, an executory contract is one in when there is performance due by both parties of the contract. Here is where the listing agreement takes center stage – what is required to earn a commission under a listing agreement? The broker must produce a ready, willing and able buyer. When according to the facts is that buyer produced? In our situation, the buyer is produced prior to the bankruptcy petition.  As such, the contract is not executory; it is contingent.  [See, In re Jones,  (Bankr. C.D.IL1988)  98 B.R. 399, cited as authority for same proposition by Ninth Circuit in In re HSD Venture, (Bankr. S.D. Cal. 1995.) 178 B.R. 831.]  The broker in In re Jones argued that its listing agreement with the debtors was executory because debtors did not actually sign the purchase contract with buyer until some time after the filing of their bankruptcy. [Id. at 401.] The court disagreed, based on the purpose of the contract – which was to provide a ready willing and able buyer, stating: here are many instances in which a real estate broker can earn its commission without there ever being a signed, enforceable, contract of sale. 

Let’s look at the rationale behind the treatment of contingent liabilities for a clearer understanding of why a non-binding letter of intent would be treated as a non-executory contract.  The controlling question is whether the letter of intent is a provable claim in the bankruptcy proceeding.  A claim includes “contingent debts and contingent contractual liabilities.” 11 U.S.C. § 101(a)(5).  A contingent claim must be “liquidated or the amount thereof estimated in the manner and within the time directed by the court.” The term “contingent debts” covers “all debts that, either as to their existence or as to their amount, depend on some event uncertain either as to its occurrence altogether, or to the time of its occurrence.” Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th ed., para. 63.30, pp. 1912-1913.  As such, since the listing agreement simply requires that the broker bring a ready, willing and able buyer, if the buyer is in place prior to the bankruptcy, the agent has fully performed and is entitled to payment.   If payment is all that remains – a contract is not executory making the broker a pre-petition general unsecured creditor.

This blog is provided as an educational service for my clients and friends.  This communiqué is an overview only, and should not be construed as legal advice or advice to take any specific action.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Grubb & Ellis Listing Agreements In Bankruptcy–Part 2

Let’s discuss the first two scenarios.  A commission is earned under most listing greements when a tenant or buyer is procured, and is not made executory by a provision conditioning payment on closing the sale. [See, e.g., Coldwell Banker & Co. v. Godwin Bevers Co. (In re Godwin Bevers Co.), 575 F.2d 805, 807 (10th Cir. 1978); In re Moskovic, 77 B.R. 421, 422-23 (Bkrtcy. S.D.N.Y. 1987); In re Murtishi, 55 B.R. 564, 569 (Bkrtcy. N.D. Ill. 1985).] Thus, where a broker has procured a buyer prior to the filing of a bankruptcy petition, the contract is not executory because the broker has already earned the right to claim a commission. [In re Moskovic, 77 B.R. 421, 423 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1987).] Thus, if a buyer has been procured prior to the filing of a bankruptcy, and all that remains is the payment of money, a contract is not executory. [Id.]  So, the commission is earned and you must pay it regardless of G&E’s bankruptcy. Likewise, if you only have prospects, the listing agreement remains valid, but you don’t owe a commission yet.

How does your good friend, the G&E agent, fair? If the commission was earned by G&E prior to the bankruptcy, but you haven’t paid it, the agent may have a problem. Under his own agreement with G&E, your agent may have “earned” the commission, but he may be an unsecured creditor of G&E.  So, your agent stands in line with the masses of trade creditors and probably will never see his “split.”  In short, your agent will be very unhappy.

This blog is provided as an educational service for my clients and friends.  This communiqué is an overview only, and should not be construed as legal advice or advice to take any specific action.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Grubb & Ellis Listing Agreements In Bankruptcy–Part I

Are you a building owner who has listed your building with Grubb & Ellis for sale or lease? Are you wondering if G&E’s bankruptcy affects you? You should be. Your listing agreement is considered an “executory contract” under the Federal bankruptcy law. You can not unilaterally cancel the listing agreement solely due to G&E’s bankruptcy.  [11 U.S.C. §365(e)(1).]  If you do cancel, you may be liable for a commission.

This blog is provided as an educational service for my clients and friends.  This communiqué is an overview only, and should not be construed as legal advice or advice to take any specific action.

Over the next few weeks, as G&E’s proposed sale to BGC Partners winds its way through the Bankruptcy Court, I’ll discuss various scenarios that affect property owners: 1.  You have a signed lease or nonconditional sales agreement; 2.  You don’t have anything inked with any prospect; 3. You have a nonbinding letter of intent; 4. You have a signed purchase agreement with conditions remaining to be waived; 5.  How is your trusted G&E agent being treated in this deal?

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Television News Story on Paragon Outlets

Construction is well under way in Livermore on the Paragon Outlets. KPIX (CBS) posted this report in January: http://www.paragonoutlets.com/construction-underway-at-livermore-outlet-mall-livermore-video

This blog is provided as an educational service for my clients and friends.  This communiqué is an overview only, and should not be construed as legal advice or advice to take any specific action.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Daily Journal Article on Retail Development

In October, the Daily Journal (California’s prestigious legal newspaper) published an article I authored on retail development.

Here is the link: http://hogefenton.com/Templates/media/files/Articles/Retail%20Development%20by%20SAS%2010-11-2011.pdf

This blog is provided as an educational service for my clients and friends.  This communiqué is an overview only, and should not be construed as legal advice or advice to take any specific action.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Paragon Outlets Livermore

Paragon Outlets Livermore

Some of the center’s walls are vertical.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Shopping Centers Today Lists Livermore Outlets

The December 2011 edition of Shopping Centers Today (published by the International Council of Shopping Centers–www.icsc.org) lists the Paragon Outlets Livermore Valley as one of the largest retail construction projects in America.  The list is found on page 86 of the magazine.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized